Ross Woods Nov. 09, rev. '15, '20, '21
A scenario is a story of a realistic situation that poses a problem. There are two main kinds:
Scenarios are usually written but can be presented by video clips. Others may be sound recordings of phone calls, phone call scripts, or role-play scripts. The key character in the story must be the person who makes the decision.
They give the same amount of information that a decision-maker in the real situation would have. In simpler cases, the information is complete. In more difficult cases, the information is deliberately incomplete because real decision-makers must sometimes make decisions without full information.
Most scenarios are fairly short, seldom more than about a page. If they are longer, they might be called a case study, and so complex that they are more likely to be fact rather than fiction.
Fictitious scenarios are better for training purposes. You can control what goes into them and don’t have to worry about people identifying themselves. If you do base them on things that really happened, at least make sure you mix in enough fiction in so that people won’t complain.
Analyzing wide range of different scenarios provides simulated experience. The benefits are:
So far, we’ve used scenarios for assessments, discussion groups, and assignments. We are looking at using them as a basis for forums on our learning management system. (It might even be be helpful to make it a competition. Put students under time-pressure to make responses, rate their responses, and count them out if they made mistakes.)
Rebeiz* lists the characteristics of effective cases, summarized as follows:
*Rebeiz, Karim S. 2011. “An Insider Perspective on Implementing the Harvard Case Study Method in Business Teaching” US-China Education Review A 5, pp. 591-601. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527670.pdf, p. 595.
In teaching, a good sequence is often as follows:
Start your students with scenarios that have easier problems and not so many complicating factors. Then build up gradually by combining problems and adding complicating factors. At the last stage, your students should cope with multiple, difficult problems and multiple, difficult complicating factors.
Students should analyze enough scenarios to reflect the breadth of experience they’d get in reality, but get it in less time than in the workplace. Students draw their own conclusions about what they should always do, what never to do, the exceptions to the rules, and what makes some solutions better than others. Solutions can take various forms:
You can also use branching scenarios. These are like flowcharts or "choose your own adventure" books. Earlier decisions eliminate later options and focus on more suitable paths of action. In other words, earlier decisions determine options later on.
Significant factors normally vary from case to case. Some general questions that students might ask:
Scenarios are particularly good for crisis management training, where you need to expose students to a range of realistic crises but cannot engineer real crises. Examples of factors in crisis management include:
Some factors might students need to consider in ministry studies:
Some examples from management studies:
Scenarios can be better than real-life experiences for assessments. It's often difficult to provide students with real experiences of workplace situations that occur rarely or at random times. It's also difficult to provide students with a perfect storm, that is, the most difficult cases. But assessors can give as many difficult scenarios as they want.
In assessment, scenarios need to be realistic simulations, and this is easiest for many office-based decisions. They need to represent the kinds of problems found in the workplace and provide the same kinds of information as found in the workplace (e.g. financial reports, client feedback, line manager reports, technical information). If a scenario is not an accurate simulation because it lacks essential aspects of realism (e.g., equipment, interpersonal pressures), it is only a test of knowledge and is not a test of skill.
Start your students with easier scenarios that have few complicating factors. Then build up gradually by combining problems and adding complicating factors. By the end, they should be able to respond to simple problems easily without much time and thought, and cope with multiple, difficult problems and multiple, difficult complicating factors.
You’ll need enough to cover all problems more than once for your students to become confident and make more timely decisions.
Make a list of any factors that affect the severity of the situation or make it more complicated, including any other kinds of risks or dangers. For example:
If you need more ways to plan simple and complex scenarios, here they are:
Simple | More complex |
---|---|
Incident at one specific time. | Longer-term situation with antecedents. |
Fewer variables. | More variables. |
Not much information is needed and all information provided is relevant. | Students must sort through lots of information and select only that which is relevant. |
Students have enough information to make a good decision. | Students have inadequate information to make a good decision. TipAs the scenario writer, you should decide what kinds of information you will conceal and how you will conceal it. For example, you could tell them that the decision-maker doesn’t know, so at least your students know where the holes are. Or you could omit it altogether and see whether students ask about it and respond ppropriately. |
The instructor can intervene by asking questions sooner rather than later. | The instructor does not intervene and lets students experience the consequences of their mistakes. |
The signs of the problem are fairly obvious. | The signs of the problem might be subject to perspective-based interpretations, multi-faceted, or difficult to identify. |
The causes of the problem are fairly obvious. | The cause of the problem might be subject to perspective-based interpretations, multi-faceted, or difficult to identify. |
Solutions are straightforward and reflect procedures. | Solutions cannot be predetermined. |
You provide the criteria for success, e.g. a standard, a deadline, a rationale. | Students suggest and defend their own criteria for success. |
Student has greater control of the situation. | Student has relatively little control of the situation. |
The scenario has one person, one problem, and relatively limited options. | The scenario has more more people, more problems, more complicating factors, and very open-ended options. |
One-time incident. | Scenarios with subsequent episodes. |
Students work in teams. | Students work alone. |
Student has time to evaluate and consider. | Student's urgent response is essential to success. |
Student does not need to consider longer term consequences or implications. | Student must consider longer term consequences or implications. |
Where is it? Describe the place and the organization. What is happening?
Who is involved? They can be clients, staff, bystanders, or anybody else relevant. Give them names and make them sound like real people. Describe them, mentioning anything else relevant: the training and experience of staff, people's temperaments, personalities, limitations, and weaknesses.
Then tell the story of the incident, putting events in the order that they happened. Make it sound unique and realistic. Have fun and be descriptive.
At the end, at the peak of the crisis, leave your readers hanging with a decision to make.
Give your scenario to some people and see what they think of it. They will probably get the point that they have to make a decision, and might ponder it. But is the scenario clear? Did you leave out anything you should have put in? Is it realistic? Then revise it.
Hints: